lalondes:

women who succeed in male-dominated fields are always labeled Female Athletes or Female Rappers or Female Presidents but when landon donovan scores 57 international goals (which is 110 less than abby wambach’s record), nobody feels it necessary to label him the Leading Male Goal Scorer. no, he just gets to be the best goal scorer. even though there are a dozen women who have outclassed him. funny how that works.

(via jesuislederp)


who-let-the-daleks-out:

thenerdgirlcometh:

I actually believe artists and scientists think very similarly. Complex, abstract thought? They both have that down. It’s all about where that thinking takes you after that.

Words cannot describe how much I love this post.

(via clareistrying)


littleladykins:

andshesgoldblooded:

“this leaves men confused and unable to pigeonhole you. What they are forced to do instead is… take you seriously.”

I will never not reblog

Forever reblogging

(via unconditionallyflawed)


avatarlegends:

swan2swan:

The universe Nickelodeon hates Chibi Korra. 

This is poetic. 

(via linbeifong)


officialcatwhisperer:

ladies rule the world meme:

[3/5] musicians » Marina and the Diamonds

(via wsswatson)


Jolie Coquine
Caravan Palace
Caravan Palace

Q
your fav childhood memory?
Anonymous
A

itsonlyyforever:

ageekyfemmeforeveringlasses:

Not paying bills

this is accuracy on a whole new level


rhamphotheca:

Giving up beef will reduce carbon footprint more than cars

Study shows red meat dwarfs others for environmental impact, using 28 times more land and 11 times water for pork or chicken

by Damian Carrington

Beef’s environmental impact dwarfs that of other meat including chicken and pork, new research reveals, with one expert saying that eating less red meat would be a better way for people to cut carbon emissions than giving up their cars.

The heavy impact on the environment of meat production was known but the research shows a new scale and scope of damage, particularly for beef. The popular red meat requires 28 times more land to produce than pork or chicken, 11 times more water and results in five times more climate-warming emissions. When compared to staples like potatoes, wheat, and rice, the impact of beef per calorie is even more extreme, requiring 160 times more land and producing 11 times more greenhouse gases…

(read more: The Guardian UK)

photos: Shutterstock and Alamy

(via dion-thesocialist)


(via tranasphere)